Since the women could no longer provide themselves with food, they had to depend on their husband's resources. In addition, it is only in agriculture that we begin to see the stratification of society into rich and poor. And when a complex civilization emerged, the richest people stopped being those who farmed the land themselves, and became landowners, merchants, bureaucrats and priests - occupations that did not require much body strength. Thus, women were really forced to choose between a handsome husband, a poor or mediocre man and live in comfort.

By the end of the twentieth century, women had made great strides in restoring gender equality, which they had lost with the advent of agriculture. Thus, social role theory predicts that women's preferences in relationships with men should shift back to views on resources to the extent that they no longer depend on men to provide them. When Eagley and Wood reanalyzed the cross-cultural data on sexual differences in marital preferences, they believed they had found just such a model.

That is, in cultures where women have more economic and political freedom, they pay less attention to resources and pay more attention to appearance when considering potential partners. Of course, they are still appreciative, but the difference between them is not so great. Due to limitations in the data and questions regarding the use of statistical methods, the conclusions of Eagley and Wood have been challenged, and most psychologists still favor the theory of evolutionary preferences.

To further test the theory of social roles, Benedict Jones, a psychologist at the University of Glasgow, and his colleagues collected a much larger cross-cultural dataset over an eight-year period and subjected it to more complex statistical procedures than Eagley and Wood. The results were disappointing for proponents of social role theory, as the researchers found little difference in preferences between men and women in more egalitarian societies compared to more traditional ones.

So, how can we interpret the results of Jones and colleagues? They support the theory of evolutionary preferences. However, as we have seen, there are reasons to be skeptical about the idea that women have developed a preference for men with resources rather than looks in an environment of evolutionary fitness. On the contrary, the theory of social roles really describes the realities of modern society, making it more plausible than the evolutionary explanation.

I think the problem lies in the way the question was posed. Social role theory suggests that women's preferences for spouses will shift towards appearance and distraction from resources as they strive for greater gender equality in their society. However, I think this idea is problematic for several reasons. How to check 1xBet promo code If these are not 1xBet free bets, but another type of promotion that the bookmaker has sent, then you should check the combination in a special section. The 1xbet bonus code to get a bonus of up to ₹33,000 for sports or ₹1,40,000 + 150 free spins. Using a promo code when registering on the 1xBet platform is an excellent way to enhance your betting experience with exclusive bonuses. Some rewards give a freebet, which must be played on certain conditions (odds, type of bet, etc.). It can be a promo code for express 1xBet and many others.